Showing posts with label Grammar Slammer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grammar Slammer. Show all posts

Saturday, 25 June 2016

Friday, 17 June 2016

Double-take, # 243

A mangled headline precedes and presages further mangling. In fact, the adverb in the report’s first paragraph, flagged by red text, is included as a variant form by Merriam-Webster, though not by British-English dictionaries. The report’s second paragraph is included here only to add colour:

Link: Daily Record and Sunday Mail
Colvend women accident sets fire; accidently

Thursday, 26 May 2016

The Wrong Word Entirely, # 109

A very odd use of a word here, in a sentence whose grammar is also dubious:

Source: Rugby Observer, ‘Violent Attacker to be Deported after Prison’ (19 May, 2016), p. 9; and online
suspect remains outstanding [+hoped that he may still be identified]

Saturday, 14 May 2016

Singular or Plural? # 19

Spotted by Dr Faustus at Locksbridge Park, a new housing development in Andover:

The early bird gets the house they want

Sunday, 8 May 2016

Double-take, # 231

The Mangling English email provider is now sending mangles direct to the inbox!


This mangle is related to one covered in more detail in December 2012. The construction here uses a personal pronoun (you) instead of the reflexive pronoun (yourself) that is needed to express the idea of performing (as the verb’s subject) an action on oneself (as the verb’s object).

An explanation, with examples of correct usage, can be found on the Oxford Dictionaries website.
Protect you and your loved ones

Tuesday, 15 March 2016

Other Englishes, # 4

I’m guessing that the writer of this spam email is not a native speaker of English, but I can’t decide quite how this range of mangles, spanning subject line to sign-off, has arisen:


you get new tax refund from GOV, You'are, An payment, King Regards

Wednesday, 17 February 2016

Multimangle, # 40

Today’s mangle of ‘appropriate’, which may be an unchecked error rather than a typographical slip, comes from a German university and brings for company some dubious syntax and grammar:

Link: CENIDE (Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen), ‘PhD project’ breadcrumb
apropirate; candidates for PhD theses which have a master’s degree; syntax

Monday, 15 February 2016

Not Washed or Cooked, # 289

A thematic run this week, starting with a reminder that, should you choose a condescending stance, it is vital to proofread before posting:

Link: Lexington Montessori School, ‘Outdoor Clothing - Tis [sic] the Season!’
Tis the Season!; approrpiate weater; your child(ren) need; CLOTHINGS

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

Saturday, 30 January 2016

Friday, 1 January 2016

Double-take, # 204

Some better than others might have been a better response in this case given the grammatical mangle arising from inaccurate reproduction of the quotation, possibly coupled with unfamiliarity with the English second-person singular:

Link: Richard Bowker, Dover Beach (Shrewsbury, PA: ePublishing Works!, 2012) at Google Books
are thou

Saturday, 21 November 2015

Singular or Plural? # 17

Someone in Sainsbury’s sign-writing department seems confused about grammatical number, and varying the order of the nouns doesn’t help:


chicken and beef is; beef and chicken is

Saturday, 14 November 2015

Not Washed or Cooked, # 263

Dr Faustus points out that today’s submission is especially reprehensible because of its source: a college that specializes, according to its logo, in ‘courses in proofreading, journalism, writing and marketing’. The mangles — a misspelling and a noun pretending to be an adjective — come from its page outlining the NCTJ [National Council for the Training of Journalists] diploma:

Source: The College of Media and Publishing. ‘Do the NCTJ diploma with the experts’
receive; specialist for specialized