Showing posts with label Spellchecking Is Never Enough. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spellchecking Is Never Enough. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 232

‘CitizenChip’, who might well hide behind a pseudonym, has mistaken the prepositional verb crack down on for the noun crackdown, both of which take the preposition on, and follows this up with some dubious syntax and a typographical error:

Link: GloucestershireLive
crack down for crackdown; of for on; area for area; [syntax]

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 231

Clearly a mistype here, although arguably the word that should have been typed isn’t quite what’s meant either:

Link: The Scotman, ‘Edinburgh Man Accused of Mock Crucifixion of Co-worker’
complaint for compliant [but arguably compliant not right either]

Friday, 27 May 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 230

Is this mangle a slip or an eggcorn? It comes from an item entirely based on an examination of posts on social media, a cheap, lazy and unsatisfactory method of ‘reporting’ that has now become ubiquitous:

Link: The Express, ‘Paxman Praised for Shining Light on REAL EU but Europhiles Complain of “BBC BIAS”’
bias for biassed/biased

Saturday, 26 March 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 228

Today’s seasonal offering brings a range of mangles wrapped a short paragraph and finished with an astoundingly apt typographical slip:

Link: Community Restaurants’ Blog, ‘So how well did Restaurants do this Easter?’
the the; thats; 16830000; Fifty one; holiday themed buffet; in that order respectively; traditional Eater meal

Friday, 18 March 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 227

It’s all very well being authoritative and expert, but the little words matter too, and a spell-checker wouldn’t flag this error:

Giuseppe Palumbo, Key Terms in Translation Studies (London and New York: Continuum, 2009), p. 20.
Online: Google Books
Keep of the grass

Monday, 14 March 2016

Thursday, 3 March 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 224

Here is another university mangling an announcement for its Teaching Excellence Awards. This one comes via the inbox of Dr Faustus:

lecturers for lectures + syntax

Monday, 22 February 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 222

Ryan McCarthy spotted this on the menu at The Fox on The Hill, a Wetherspoon pub in Denmark Hill, London:

Cartmel for Caramel OR Cartmel sticky toffee pudding for Cartmel Sticky Toffee Pudding

Friday, 12 February 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 221

The last of the competency-test mangles submitted by Dr Faustus contains more spelling errors, more random capitalization and an ill-checked interrogative formulation:

Source: Numerical Reasoning Test
passanger, carrage, which how much more; capitalization

Thursday, 11 February 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 220

More competency test mangles from Dr Faustus. Today’s example seems to be mainly about random capitalization, although ‘£1000-worth’ might better express the purchases, or reordering resulting in ‘at £1000’:

Source: Numerical Reasoning Test
Rice; august; Maize; £1000 of Rice/Maize

Monday, 8 February 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 218

Dr Faustus seems to have been doing some online competency tests, and finding various mangles. Today’s include an accidental substitute, some American spelling that seems to have crept onto the global company’s British website, a stray bit of code, and some rather dubious logic:

Source: CEB — SHL Talent Measurement
traveled; causalities for casualties; [+ logic + <]

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

Wednesday, 20 January 2016

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 214

Dr Faustus recently found this mangle on the application form for the graduate trainee scheme of The Financial Times. He comments: ‘Can’t believe the FT can’t proofread...’ It has to be said that the syntax isn’t prime quality either:

proved for provide