![]() |
| Link: Rugby Adverttiser |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label omissions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label omissions. Show all posts
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Double-take, # 248
The mangled headline is just the beginning:
[headline but no report, or pictures, or anything]
Sunday, 19 June 2016
Multimangle, # 55
Another unsolicited email, with a rather naive subject line, from the inbox of Dr Faustus:
write you; no for not; 30mins; if you have interest in know what the job entails [omitted articles; comma splices]
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 304
Dr Faustus has spotted someone with a sticky space bar (and some super-sibilant acronyms):
Growthin for Growth in
![]() |
| Link: University College London [UCL], ‘Call for Papers […]’ |
Wednesday, 30 March 2016
Multimangle, # 47
Dr Faustus reports a sticky space bar at Shakespeare’s Globe (the first instance now corrected on the webpage, although the space seems to have been lifted from the later section on The White Devil, ‘Webster’stragedy’) in a synopsis that also uses revenge in a less than meaningful manner:
![]() |
| Link: Shakespeare’s Globe, ‘Read Not Dead’ |
Sunday, 13 March 2016
Saturday, 12 March 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 299
Today’s mangle was spotted in Elephant & Castle Station by Dr Faustus, in an advertisement for Sir John Cass's Foundation and Red Coat School. This is a puzzling error. Surely, with a repeating pattern like this, the obvious thing to do is check the first set thoroughly and then copy and paste it?
Wednesdy
Friday, 19 February 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 292
The last day of misspellings of ‘appropriate’ brings several other mangles, including an idiosyncratic use of exclamation marks:
![]() |
| Link: GigSalad, ‘Amber Belly Dance’ |
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 219
From the competency test featured yesterday, Dr Faustus now sends problems with prepositions:
![]() |
| Source: CEB — SHL Talent Measurement |
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 216
Dr Faustus, still unimpressed by Waterstones abandoning its apostrophe, doesn’t think much of its staff’s proofreading abilities either:
Sunday, 31 January 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 287
A strange new word in an article on good university teachers:
![]() |
| Link: The Guardian, ‘Want to improve teaching in universities? Value those who teach’ |
Monday, 4 January 2016
Multimangle, # 32
From Des Pond of Slough, an omitted letter and an apostrophe that has apparently fallen from its rightful place into a later paragraph:
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘The Crystal Maze returns […]’ |
Sunday, 3 January 2016
Double-take, # 206
Using countries’ names adjectivally often feels odd and is arguably ungrammatical, and much more so with acronyms… and that’s not even the mangle here!
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘The history of Guide Dogs for the Blind’ |
Thursday, 10 December 2015
Double-take, # 202
How can any professional writer think that a singular verb might be appropriate here? (The article’s title seems short of a possessive pronoun, too.)
millions of pounds has [+ title: At 95, I’m fighting the NHS to fund wife’s care]
| Link: The Sunday Times, ‘Money’ section, ‘At 95, I’m fighting the NHS to fund wife’s care’ |
Tuesday, 8 December 2015
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 207
Old Chelsea has been dining at Ciao Bella in London, where at least one mangled dessert is on offer:
covered with tick layer
Saturday, 24 October 2015
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 200
Stilted syntax and a mangle, spotted by Dr Faustus:
![]() |
| Link: BBC News, ‘China shares fall more than 8% on growth concerns’ |
The mangled verb was subsequently changed — unfortunately to the simple present ‘saw’ rather than the past perfect (or pluperfect) ‘had seen’ that the context‘s temporal logic requires, and which seemed to be what the writer had originally intended.
seen for hd seen [+saw for had seen]
Sunday, 11 October 2015
You Cannot Be Serious, # 57
This political poster is currently doing the rounds on social media. In addition to the typographical mangle and the odd temporal description, the group’s identifying acronym and logo are omitted:
airstikes; ‘just several days’ [+ missing identifying logo/acronym]
Monday, 31 August 2015
Other Englishes, # 2
Following on from yesterday’s scam email, here is a second, showing another familiar set of errors, such as stilted syntax, the omission of direct and indirect articles, or use of an incorrect article, and the omission of a letter at the end of a word that results in a spell-checker appeasing preposition instead of the intended noun:
missing/incorrect articles (Natwest Online Banking team; introduce new much secured …] process; you are the member of our online banking); simple for filling procedure; you can get advantage
Monday, 24 August 2015
Friday, 14 August 2015
Multimangle, # 24
Here, via Dr Faustus, is a much and variously mangled blurb for the SWLondoner [sic]:
![]() |
| Link: SWLondoner, ‘Read the July edition of South West Londoner packed with news, features and entertainment’ |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















