Showing posts with label Mangling Meaning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mangling Meaning. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 April 2016

Mangling Meaning, # 38

Via Dr Faustus, meaning is much mangled by a failure (throughout the report) to use the required initial capital letter for the adjective. The odd punctuation in the opening sentence is a bonus:

Link: BBC News
catholic for Catholic; Chief Constable, George Hamilton, says

Sunday, 3 April 2016

Mangling Meaning, # 37

Incoherence verging on utter nonsense from The Express:

Link: The Express, ‘Outrage as Hotel Homes 300 Asylum Seekers — Without Telling Anyone’
asylum seekers have been housed in a major hotel without informing anyone; in what the authorities claim is on the sly

Sunday, 20 March 2016

Mangling Meaning, # 36

Dr Faustus has submitted this snapshot from a BBC report which has since been much (and tacitly) rewritten. (The original text is reproduced verbatim here and elsewhere online.) In the second paragraph here, further comments from an expert previously quoted are reported very badly, and the punctuation seems to have been inserted at random:

Link: BBC News, ‘How low can the oil price go – and what is the impact?’
He adds that a great level of unrest might add a geopolitical unrest – and consequent worries about supplies – might push prices higher. But not by much, he says.

Saturday, 19 March 2016

Mangling Meaning, # 35

How many people have been arrested? (Headline and subhead have now been carefully rewritten to resolve the confusion.)

Link: The Telegraph, ‘French police “arrest man with guns in suitcase” […]’
Man arrested […] another woman arrested with him

Saturday, 30 January 2016

Thursday, 17 December 2015

Multimangle, # 29

Today’s main mangle, an adjective that has been mistaken for a similar word, sits in glorious splendour at the head of this screamer. The adjacent caption uses the mangled word correctly, and shows why it was wrong when first used, and also contains a lovely mangle of its own!

Link: Rugby Observer, 12 November, 2015, p. 1
seasonal for seasonable; Cristmas

Saturday, 29 August 2015

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

The Wrong Word Entirely, # 84

It’s hard to tell whether this error is the journalist’s or the bank’s, although surely the former should have corrected it anyway. Since t and p are not adjacent on the keyboard, it’s probably not a typographical error, and is more likely to be a mondegreen or eggcorn since, when sounded with a glottal stop, the wrong word can barely, if at all, be distinguished from the correct word. Similar errors in published writing and in students’ written work suggest that this is becoming an increasingly common problem.

Link: The Sunday Times (subscription access only), ‘Scandal of the missing cash from dormant RBS account’
upmost for utmost

Thursday, 16 July 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 33

Is this ambiguity, redundancy or plain confusion in a promotional email from TomTom? Des Pond of Slough wonders: ‘Does “at once” mean immediately or simultaneously here? Is it “quickly” or “multiple” that is being rendered superfluous?’ 

quickly charge multiple devices at once

Saturday, 16 May 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 31

Going the rounds on social media (but original source unknown) is this assembly of mangled syntax and grammar, which, in nonsensically separating its prepositional ‘but’ from the clause it is supposed to qualify with end of sentence punctuation, manages to compromise its own point:

nonsensical ‘But’ starts sentence; changed for has changed; punctuation…

Saturday, 2 May 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 30

One from John Holloway. He didn’t say where he found it, but he did comment: ‘Preposition errors can make SUCH a difference to the meaning!’

coming at my home

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 28

The odd phrasing here leads to an unlikely, unpleasant and erroneous premise:

Link: The Telegraph, ‘Husband and wife found dead in suspected murder-suicide’

The combination of ‘is accused’ and ‘before’ suggests a cause and effect scenario which is not — this being journalism — negated by the shift of tense from the headline to the subhead. Someone who is dead cannot be ‘accused’ in the sense of being charged with an offence; but the only other meaning of the word (see Oxford Dictionaries), to claim someone has done something wrong, is also illogical: as the circumstances are as yet uncertain, it cannot be firmly asserted that events transpired as stated here. Perhaps the writer should have changed the verb and used one of those spare allegedlys from last week.
A […] man is accused of killing his 73-year-old wife in the bedroom before taking his own life

Thursday, 26 February 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 26

Another strange verbal construction and some less than smooth punctuation from Sky’s on-screen television guide:


sold 250 millions

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Mangling Meaning, # 25

This is another example of yesterday’s mangle, this time preceded by some confusing syntax:

Link: Coventry Telegraph, ‘Coventry pensioner conned out of cash in bogus lottery scam’

Ambiguity results from the omission of the conjunction that, which would indicate both the start of the subordinate clause and its relation to the main clause, and its replacement with inaccurate and inadequate punctuation. These errors mean that the ground is not prepared for the rest of the sentence, and indeed make it seem at first that the Trading Standards spokeswoman is replying to the correspondence. The omission of the conjunction also means that it is unclear whether the section beginning ‘victims’ is correctly shown as reported speech (Morgan said [that] victims), or actually direct speech that lacks quotation marks (Morgan said: ‘Victims’), which is underlined by the use of the same term, said, to introduce both direct and indirect speech. The whole is nonsensically laid out in paragraphs made of short, single sentences, producing a disjointed style that does not aid comprehension.
syntax [missing that = ambiguity]; paragraphing; sucker’s list

Wednesday, 2 July 2014

Thursday, 15 May 2014

Mangling Meaning, # 24

I’m not sure where Bob Godiva found this (and he was slightly cagey when I enquired), but it’s a princely example of obfuscation:

school free drug zone

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Double-take, # 62

A puzzle from my inbox:


No, Nectar, a comma is not the same as an infinitive ‘to’.
help us, help you