![]() |
| Link: Rugby Adverttiser |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label media & journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media & journalism. Show all posts
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Double-take, # 248
The mangled headline is just the beginning:
[headline but no report, or pictures, or anything]
Saturday, 25 June 2016
Multimangle, # 56
This does not reflect well on the writer, the education system, or an industry that largely seems to have decided that sub-editors aren’t necessary:
![]() |
| Link: SomersetLive, ‘Crocs are Bad for Your Health Say Experts, as Patients Complain of Heel Pain on Daily Basis’ |
Friday, 24 June 2016
Double-take, # 247
At a time when every online report and article must be illustrated, however unpictorial the subject, here is a recent (and mangled) attempt to represent visually the news report ‘Sheffield Posties to Go on Strike this Weekend’:
![]() |
| Link: The Star (Sheffield) |
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 232
‘CitizenChip’, who might well hide behind a pseudonym, has mistaken the prepositional verb crack down on for the noun crackdown, both of which take the preposition on, and follows this up with some dubious syntax and a typographical error:
![]() |
| Link: GloucestershireLive |
Monday, 20 June 2016
Double-take, # 245
This is not an adjective:
hero for heroic
![]() |
| Link: South Hams Gazette, ‘Dog Alerts Dartmouth Family to Fridge-freezer Blaze’ |
Saturday, 18 June 2016
Double-take, # 244
It isn’t clear whether the mangle in this breadcrumb, leading to a report whose headline uses the correct word, is typographical or grammatical, but its first word is definitely not a noun:
![]() |
| Link: Hereford Times, ‘Hereford Teenager Jailed for Online Sex Offences’ |
Friday, 17 June 2016
Double-take, # 243
A mangled headline precedes and presages further mangling. In fact, the adverb in the report’s first paragraph, flagged by red text, is included as a variant form by Merriam-Webster, though not by British-English dictionaries. The report’s second paragraph is included here only to add colour:
![]() |
| Link: Daily Record and Sunday Mail |
Thursday, 16 June 2016
Multimangle, # 54
Dubious grammar and punctuation:
number … are + punctuation
![]() |
| Link: The Scotman, ‘Scots Students Losing out to English at Home Universities’ |
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 231
Clearly a mistype here, although arguably the word that should have been typed isn’t quite what’s meant either:
![]() |
| Link: The Scotman, ‘Edinburgh Man Accused of Mock Crucifixion of Co-worker’ |
Tuesday, 14 June 2016
Double-take, # 242
As Mo Juste points out, ‘This does rather sound like a large and dangerous bag is at large.’ It is hard to see how the bag is significant enough to feature in the headline at all, much less in prime position (it appears near the end of the report, as part of a description of the miscreant), but, as it stands, a hyphen might improve matters:
![]() |
| Link: Northampton Chronicle & Echo |
Monday, 13 June 2016
Double-take, # 241
The mangles are bad enough, but given that Paris was submerged at the time (3 June, 2016) and the Louvre was sending key pieces offsite for safety, the verb ‘flood’ seems ill-chosen:
![]() |
| Link: Mirrorspectrum, ‘Media Blackout As France Witnesses Biggest Revolution in 200 Years’ |
Thursday, 9 June 2016
Double-take, # 240
A noun-verb mismatch in the headline is supported by an odd turn of phrase in the subheading, plus a possible eggcorn:
![]() |
| Link: WalesOnline |
Wednesday, 8 June 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 312
Tuesday, 7 June 2016
You Cannot Be Serious, # 73
From Mo Juste, who comments: ‘It looks like part of the old game show — “rearrange these words into a well known phrase or saying”.’
![]() |
| Link: Northampton Chronicle & Echo |
Sunday, 5 June 2016
Apostrophe catastrophe, # 115
Dr Faustus is unimpressed by the persistent misuse of apostrophes in this press release:
CV’s (x3)
![]() |
| Link: ResponseSource Press Release Wire |
Monday, 30 May 2016
The Wrong Word Entirely, # 110
This mangle, spotted by Dr Faustus, has now been corrected:
insure for ensure
![]() |
| Link: BBC News, ‘Alton Towers Smiler Ride Reopens Nine Months After Horror Crash’ |
Sunday, 29 May 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 310
Via Dr Faustus:
procratisnation
![]() |
| Link: The Independent, ‘Procrastination Makes You More Creative, Research Says’ |
Friday, 27 May 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 230
Is this mangle a slip or an eggcorn? It comes from an item entirely based on an examination of posts on social media, a cheap, lazy and unsatisfactory method of ‘reporting’ that has now become ubiquitous:
| Link: The Express, ‘Paxman Praised for Shining Light on REAL EU but Europhiles Complain of “BBC BIAS”’ |
Thursday, 26 May 2016
The Wrong Word Entirely, # 109
A very odd use of a word here, in a sentence whose grammar is also dubious:
![]() |
| Source: Rugby Observer, ‘Violent Attacker to be Deported after Prison’ (19 May, 2016), p. 9; and online |
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Multimangle, # 52
Many a mangle in this advertisement for the Fox Inn, Lutterworth:
resturaunt, extensiver, your'e [+ random capitalization, punctuation & syntax]
![]() |
| Link: Rugby Observer, 19 May, 2016, p. 16 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















