![]() |
| Link: Rugby Adverttiser |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label verb-noun agreement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label verb-noun agreement. Show all posts
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Double-take, # 248
The mangled headline is just the beginning:
[headline but no report, or pictures, or anything]
Thursday, 16 June 2016
Multimangle, # 54
Dubious grammar and punctuation:
number … are + punctuation
![]() |
| Link: The Scotman, ‘Scots Students Losing out to English at Home Universities’ |
Thursday, 9 June 2016
Double-take, # 240
A noun-verb mismatch in the headline is supported by an odd turn of phrase in the subheading, plus a possible eggcorn:
![]() |
| Link: WalesOnline |
Monday, 23 May 2016
Not Washed or Cooked, # 309
From Just Liam comes this mind-boggling mangle. As is isn’t possible to determine how vacancies are uploaded and by whom, the perpetrator is not apparent, although the bonus mangle, from the same page, must certainly be the university’s own text:
![]() |
| Link: Indeed, ‘Instructor or Assistant Professer: UMD Department of History’ |
Professer; Smoking, chewing tobacco and the use of electronic cigarettes is prohibited
Tuesday, 12 January 2016
Multimangle, # 34
This is horribly mangled:
“a horrible, horrible, horrible translation” one that; The translation was made by Tolkien in the 1920s and intended it to be “crib notes” that was to be used
![]() |
| Link: Medievalists.net, ‘Why Tolkien’s Beowulf is an “amazing book but a terrible translation”’ |
Tuesday, 15 December 2015
Multimangle, # 28
Dr Faustus sent this in for Singular or Plural?, highlighting the second paragraph’s nasty noun-verb disagreement. I’ve also kept the previous paragraph in the screenshot, which supplies a range of mangles, including the failed past participle, the nonsensical order of the first two clauses which, as it stands, expresses a chronological impossibility, and also the use of an indicative (‘is’) where a subjunctive would make more sense. The BBC’s own version of the text has now been considerably altered by further editing, but the text as originally published can be found via a Google search:
![]() |
| Link: BBC News, ‘China’s yuan gains IMF reserve status’ |
Thursday, 10 December 2015
Double-take, # 202
How can any professional writer think that a singular verb might be appropriate here? (The article’s title seems short of a possessive pronoun, too.)
millions of pounds has [+ title: At 95, I’m fighting the NHS to fund wife’s care]
| Link: The Sunday Times, ‘Money’ section, ‘At 95, I’m fighting the NHS to fund wife’s care’ |
Wednesday, 4 November 2015
You Cannot Be Serious, # 61
A hideous grammatical lapse on a page nonsensically headed ‘Security on Eurostar?’:
We […] recommend that all valuables and important documentation is kept
![]() |
| Link: Eurostar.com, ‘Security on Eurostar?’ |
Saturday, 26 September 2015
Multimangle, # 26
The stone circle alluded to here certainly predates the apostrophe, and the name applied to it may well do, but the modern signage at the site does not and apostrophes consistently appear in the name on the official website (of which more tomorrow). It is also not apparent why the name here is treated as a plural when ‘The Rollright Stones’ — equally plural to the naked eye — takes singular verb forms on the website (where this name does not appear as a subject); nor why the superfluous singular subject noun in the first paragraph on the sign is treated as if plural:
Kings Men
Friday, 25 September 2015
Singular or Plural? # 16
The Telegraph hedges its bets in this article about the RSPB:
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘RSPB’s failure with hen harrier nests in £2m scheme’ |
Saturday, 29 August 2015
Double-take, # 180
This pair of mangles (and some dubious punctuation) comes from an estate agents’ description of a property:
![]() |
| Link: Rightmove, Edward Knight (Elizabeth Way, Long Lawford, Rugby, Warwickshire) |
Saturday, 20 June 2015
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 184
Noun-verb disharmony, easily avoided by proofreading, and an illogical preposition:
plans […] was
![]() |
| Link: Bucks Free Press, ‘Radnage residents fight against plans to turn the Three Horseshoes pub into a house’ |
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Double-take, # 151
This was spotted by John Holloway at Torpoint Yacht Harbour in Cornwall:
Perhaps the writer was a fan of the television series The Dukes of Hazzard.
hazzard for hazard
Perhaps the writer was a fan of the television series The Dukes of Hazzard.
hazzard for hazard
Tuesday, 18 November 2014
Double-take, # 114
The verb, but not the inadequate punctuation, has been corrected since Des Pond of Slough spotted this last Friday morning:
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘Rosetta Mission: What Can They Do to Save Philae?’ |
Friday, 30 August 2013
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 82
This example contains the problematic cliché discussed yesterday, but the focus today is on the verb:
Three nouns and a singular verb…
Monday, 13 May 2013
The Wrong Word Entirely, # 5
Today's offering, taken from an email from the Telegraph about an IT glitch in its subscriber routine, contains a range of issues relating to clarity of expression, mainly connected to the failure to have the pronouns agree in number with the nouns to which they supposedly relate. Thus both the Technical Team and the subscribers are represented by the plural 'they', making it seem that it is the subscribers, not the technicians, who are running the tests. Then there's the fact that the subscribers, being referred to as 'that' rather than 'who', seem to have been stripped of humanity.
However, the star mangle occurs in the final line:
Thursday, 18 April 2013
Mangling Meaning, # 6
This piece from last Saturday's online Coventry Telegraph rather needed some grammar, punctuation, editing and proofreading. It's not clear whether (or how much of) the mangling is original to the quotation or as filtered by the writer…
Thursday, 11 April 2013
Singular or plural? # 3
The grammar in these paragraphs, from the Android version of a BBC report published earlier this week, became more confused as the text continued:
The online version shows the correct form of the verb to harmonize with 'formula' in the first paragraph, but it's still not clear how the pronoun 'them' is supposed to function in the second paragraph:
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
Singular or plural? # 2
This one's been superceded as mangle of the day a couple of times, but its moment has finally come.
Recent reading suggests that we're likely quite soon to be having a lot of examples of verbs not agreeing in number.
Friday, 29 March 2013
Not Washed or Cooked, # 16
The Pope's homily at the Holy Thursday Mass of the Chrism yesterday was reproduced by the online Catholic Herald. The preamble ― presumably not written by Pope Francis, even though he alone is credited in the byline ― offered a summary and a duplicated mangle:
Spellchecking and proofreading are clearly not encouraged at the Catholic Herald. There's also a failure to harmonize quotations from the homily, resulting in a confused final paragraph:
Since 'Pope' is the only singular noun preceding the pronoun, the comment implies that some priests may become dissatisfied by the Pope's negative qualities…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




















