![]() |
Link: The Scotman, ‘Scots Students Losing out to English at Home Universities’ |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label The Scotsman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Scotsman. Show all posts
Thursday, 16 June 2016
Multimangle, # 54
Dubious grammar and punctuation:
number … are + punctuation
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 231
Clearly a mistype here, although arguably the word that should have been typed isn’t quite what’s meant either:
![]() |
Link: The Scotman, ‘Edinburgh Man Accused of Mock Crucifixion of Co-worker’ |
Friday, 10 May 2013
Not Washed or Cooked, # 26
Here are some examples of a not-uncommon mangle that shouldn't have got through a proofread, and clearly didn't have a spell-check. First, a headline:
The writer may not have been responsible for the headline, of course, but it does make you wonder whether the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development is an institute where spelling doesn't matter…
Now some copy, so definitely the fault of the writer, Stuart Kelly:
And finally, a heading that undermines the authority of anything else on the page:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)