![]() |
| Link: Rugby Adverttiser |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label Double-take. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Double-take. Show all posts
Sunday, 26 June 2016
Double-take, # 248
The mangled headline is just the beginning:
[headline but no report, or pictures, or anything]
Friday, 24 June 2016
Double-take, # 247
At a time when every online report and article must be illustrated, however unpictorial the subject, here is a recent (and mangled) attempt to represent visually the news report ‘Sheffield Posties to Go on Strike this Weekend’:
![]() |
| Link: The Star (Sheffield) |
Wednesday, 22 June 2016
Double-take, # 246
What a difference a hyphen can — or would — make!
Pram pushing Barnstaple mother ‘so drunk she couldn't stand’
![]() |
| Link: North Devon Journal |
Monday, 20 June 2016
Double-take, # 245
This is not an adjective:
hero for heroic
![]() |
| Link: South Hams Gazette, ‘Dog Alerts Dartmouth Family to Fridge-freezer Blaze’ |
Saturday, 18 June 2016
Double-take, # 244
It isn’t clear whether the mangle in this breadcrumb, leading to a report whose headline uses the correct word, is typographical or grammatical, but its first word is definitely not a noun:
![]() |
| Link: Hereford Times, ‘Hereford Teenager Jailed for Online Sex Offences’ |
Friday, 17 June 2016
Double-take, # 243
A mangled headline precedes and presages further mangling. In fact, the adverb in the report’s first paragraph, flagged by red text, is included as a variant form by Merriam-Webster, though not by British-English dictionaries. The report’s second paragraph is included here only to add colour:
![]() |
| Link: Daily Record and Sunday Mail |
Tuesday, 14 June 2016
Double-take, # 242
As Mo Juste points out, ‘This does rather sound like a large and dangerous bag is at large.’ It is hard to see how the bag is significant enough to feature in the headline at all, much less in prime position (it appears near the end of the report, as part of a description of the miscreant), but, as it stands, a hyphen might improve matters:
![]() |
| Link: Northampton Chronicle & Echo |
Monday, 13 June 2016
Double-take, # 241
The mangles are bad enough, but given that Paris was submerged at the time (3 June, 2016) and the Louvre was sending key pieces offsite for safety, the verb ‘flood’ seems ill-chosen:
![]() |
| Link: Mirrorspectrum, ‘Media Blackout As France Witnesses Biggest Revolution in 200 Years’ |
Thursday, 9 June 2016
Double-take, # 240
A noun-verb mismatch in the headline is supported by an odd turn of phrase in the subheading, plus a possible eggcorn:
![]() |
| Link: WalesOnline |
Thursday, 2 June 2016
Double-take, # 238
Someone at this publishing house is clearly trying to follow a pattern, but not all cases fit:
children literature
![]() |
| Link: W. W. Norton & Company, ‘Norton Critical Editions’ |
Saturday, 28 May 2016
Tuesday, 24 May 2016
Double-take, # 236
This seems improbable:
hops for hips [+ professor for Professor]
![]() |
| Link: MNT/Medical News Today, ‘Menopause Does Not Result In Weight Gain […]’ |
Sunday, 22 May 2016
Double-take, # 235
A confusion of past forms (with bonus mangled syntax):
rang for rung
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘Debtor days are over as BIS calls time on world credit binge’ |
Saturday, 21 May 2016
Monday, 16 May 2016
Wednesday, 11 May 2016
Double-take, # 232
This mangled text was found on Oxford University’s website by Arina, who comments: ‘It’s hilarious that this comes from the description of a module on editing.’
![]() |
| Link: University of Oxford Language Centre, ‘English for Academic Studies’ |
Sunday, 8 May 2016
Double-take, # 231
The Mangling English email provider is now sending mangles direct to the inbox!
This mangle is related to one covered in more detail in December 2012. The construction here uses a personal pronoun (you) instead of the reflexive pronoun (yourself) that is needed to express the idea of performing (as the verb’s subject) an action on oneself (as the verb’s object).
An explanation, with examples of correct usage, can be found on the Oxford Dictionaries website.
Protect you and your loved ones
An explanation, with examples of correct usage, can be found on the Oxford Dictionaries website.
Saturday, 7 May 2016
Double-take, # 230
The writer of this report seems not to understand that a whole word does not work the same way as its abbreviation, and needs a space:
![]() |
| Link: Express, ‘Private Contractors Cost NHS, and Taxpayers, Millions in Botched Operations’ |
Friday, 6 May 2016
Double-take, # 229
Some time ago, Dr Faustus submitted this shot of a mangle from the printed Radio Times (edition unknown). A search on its website suggests that this mangle occurs quite often in the publication:
The ‘i before e’ issue was addressed by Mangling English in December 2012.
fiesty
Wednesday, 4 May 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















