![]() |
| Link: BBC News, ‘Russian plane crash […]’ |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label quantifiable & measurable nouns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quantifiable & measurable nouns. Show all posts
Monday, 23 November 2015
Double-take, # 197
A humdinger of a mangle spotted by Dr Faustus:
There are lot’s of anger
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
You Cannot Be Serious, # 44
This mangle has already been featured a few times and, as before, it’s the source of the error that makes it particularly reprehensible. This one, contributed by Dr Faustus, comes from a closed questionnaire on the website of an academic publisher:
less for fewer
Thursday, 10 October 2013
How much and how many?
A forwarded message in my inbox, with the subject line: ‘Dr Faustus says: Someone doesn’t realise that you can count people...’ Here (edited slightly) is the offending email:
Dr Faustus commented: ‘Fewer than 18 students! Fewer than! /rage.’*
* The OxfordDictionaries page ‘“Less” or “fewer”?’ explains how to tell when to use less and when to use fewer. I’d also point out that the correct UK-English spelling is enrolment, and the use of the hyphen (presumably meant to represent a dash) is erroneous, since the ‘Many thanks’ clause and the passage beginning ‘unfortunately’ do not share a subject and should be separate sentences.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


