Showing posts with label solecism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solecism. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 April 2016

Friday, 22 January 2016

Sunday, 31 May 2015

Double-take, # 156

Adding insult to injury, this is extracted from a letter sent by Lloyds Bank announcing a drop in the interest rate with a solecism resulting from omitting the word ‘account’:

eSavings is changing

Sunday, 12 April 2015

Apostrophe catastrophe, # 78

From a smartphone BBC News report comes a missing apostrophe, and a puzzle: why use single quotation marks in the headline and doubles in the subhead? The online version has no subhead, but it too nonsensically varies its quotation marks with singles in the headline and doubles in the body of the piece…

Source: BBC News for smartphone
pounds worth + interchangeable single & double quotation marks