![]() |
| Link: Hereford Times, ‘Hereford dog believed […]’ |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Showing posts with label phrasal verb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label phrasal verb. Show all posts
Tuesday, 22 September 2015
Double-take, # 182
A redoubled prepositional mangle in this headline:
to be added and removed to banned breed list
Tuesday, 7 July 2015
Double-take, # 167
Just Liam is understandably puzzled by the use of the verb in this newspaper placard in York:
bus engine sets on fire
The idea of spontaneity, which requires the construction ‘catches fire’, seems here to have been confused with the idea of agency, ‘is set on fire’. Oxford Dictionaries (fire, 11) confirms that the use of ‘set’ in relation to ‘fire’ needs both a specific preposition and an object, either in the form of ‘set fire to something’ or ‘set something on fire’.
The publication that issued the placard is simply called The Press. The wording is not replicated at the top of the online story, where there is no headline at all, but instead a rather odd and archaic sweep of key points (with rather odd and archaic random capitalization) separated by dashes:
![]() |
| Link: The Press, ‘Bus fire in York […]’ |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


