‘There’s a mangle,’ said Des Pond of Slough, ‘they’ve put Devizes by mistake.’ That was how I heard it, but actually…
Link: Rugby Observer, 16 October 2014, advertising wrapper |
… it turned out not to be Devizes for devises, but devises for devices — more heinous, of course, since they aren’t actually homophonic.
devises for devices
No comments:
Post a Comment