Showing posts with label archaic & superseded spellings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label archaic & superseded spellings. Show all posts

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Not Washed or Cooked, # 166

Des Pond of Slough found today’s mangle on this year’s Heritage Open Days webpages. Presumably, it exactly reproduces material supplied by the venue, which is odd since this is a word much used in the theatre:

Link: Heritage Open Days, Royal and Derngate Theatres
rehersal

Thursday, 12 June 2014

The Wrong Word Entirely, # 46

This has been going the rounds on Facebook, and I haven’t been able to trace its source. Given the system of pairings in the list, it seems clear that the wrong word has been chosen in the first pair:

Original source unknown

Complement has been mistaken for compliment. These words, identical bar the one vowel, have very different meanings. To borrow the definitions from Oxford Dictionaries, complement as a verb means to ‘add to something in a way that enhances or improves’, while compliment means to ‘admire and praise someone for something’.

OED shows that both derive from the same Latin root (complÄ“mentum, meaning ‘that which fills up or completes’, from the verb complÄ“re, ‘to fill up’), and come into English via French. It notes too that complement was sometimes used for compliment in the seventeenth and the early eighteenth centuries.
complements for compliments