Thursday 31 January 2013

Tuesday 29 January 2013

You Cannot Be Serious, # 6

Today's contribution, courtesy of Bob Godiva, suggests that sponsorship can be a dangerous thing:




You need really good, clear diction for this one

Here's the online version, where the illustration sports an unlikely caption, perhaps written tongue in cheek:

Sadly, like so many of the best things in life, this turns out to be a mirage: as you've probably already guessed, Fair City News is, of course, a spoof publication (and well worth a look).
 

Monday 28 January 2013

Not Washed or Cooked, # 6

Someone must have been paid to take the time to scan this in, run Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software, save the file, and upload the result: 


Why, though? Never mind 'not 100% accurate': what possible use is the result to anyone?

With all the material there must be to archive, surely it's better just scan the original and upload it. This works:

 

Saturday 26 January 2013

Now Try It In English, # 2

This was quoted in a Daily Telegraph report that was rather generously supplied with mangles:


A trawl round the internet shows that, so far at least, this mangle seems not to be widespread, though it's not unique —


— and it may, of  course, be standard police jargon, as this clip from a PoliceUK.com forum suggests:


The slogan 'Stamp Out Crime' was once common. How about 'Stamp Out "Crime" As A Verb'?

Thursday 24 January 2013

Not Washed or Cooked, # 5

It's fair to say that spellchecking isn't possible in this situation, and it's too late for proofreading at this stage. This photograph of a friend-of-a-friend's arm has been going round the internet for a while:


It was his first tattoo, and may well be his last; if not, I recommend a move to graphics-only.

Wednesday 23 January 2013

Now Try It In English, # 1

This is rather eye-watering:

 
The speaker is Anna Soubry, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of Health, who has previously worked in journalism and law.

Tuesday 22 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 25

A quick return today to a familiar and frequent mangle




The copyright on the webpage is 1997-2005. You'd have thought someone would have mentioned the error by now; but then there's no obvious way to contact the author…

Monday 21 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 24

Another of my cousin's Christmas presents was a jolly little volume called The Quotations of Oscar Wilde, The Drawings of Simon Drew (2004), which included this typographical error:


At less than 50 pages, and mainly illustrations, it can't have been much effort to proofread the book properly.

Sunday 20 January 2013

You Cannot Be Serious, # 5

Today, a contribution from an alert Manglereader:


It's not apparent whether this was mangled by the representative from the NUT (that's the UK's National Union of Teachers, for the benefit of international readers) or the anonymous journalist. Both of them should have realized that 'behold' here was gibberish.*
 
Behove (or behoove, which US-English prefers, while UK-English uses either) is rather rare these days, but both the Oxford English Dictionary and Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary include it as viable and in current usage.


* Given that one represents schoolteachers and the other writes for a living, both should also have known that the construction 'many official warnings' needs a plural verb form (more on verbal agreement soon), and that the 'not just' part of the not only but also formula should appear before 'to make a judgement' to make good sense.  However, since it's likely that the comments were made over the telephone, and possibly at short notice, these can't fairly be counted as full-blooded mangles.

Saturday 19 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 23

Today's mangles come from four different sources, all of which presumably want to be taken seriously, but all of which failed to check before publication whether their work contained unfortunate slips of the fingers.





C&O might be forgiven, though even a non-profit organization should bother to proofread to make sure it's displaying itself as well as possible. The journalist should certainly know better, but it's not a rare error in the media. Dartmouth College Library is displaying a pretty dire 'pubic face' for this project; but the instance in Isis Marion Young's book takes the prize here: various educated persons, such as the publisher's reader(s) and maybe even an editor, will have read the work in its journey from proposal to publication and should have picked this one up. Perhaps they all thought Young was making some kind of obscure pun and didn't like to ask…

Thursday 17 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 22

Of course the pubic typo — of which more in due course: it's a popular one — can work both ways:


I'd rather not have had an opportunity to associate M&S with infestation… but apparently the advertising keeps the site free, and Right Diagnosis (RD) may be able to afford a proofreader one day. 
 
Right Diagnosis, in case you're wondering, is 'one of the world's leading providers of online medical health information'. That's what its About Us page says and it should know:


It's good to know consumers and health professionals have somewhere they can find information about public lice, whatever they are… except, as the astute will have spotted, it actually doesn't say that at all. It seems to be referring to a different website altogether: WrongDiagnosis.com.

So what happens when you type 'www.wrongdiagnosis.com' into an address bar and hit the return key?


You arrive here:


It's beyond me! I think it may be beyond them too…
 

Wednesday 16 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 21

The world of university education may be stranger than you imagined. Below is a selection of courses and departments.


A course in the University of North Carolina Wilmington's brochure (corrected in the 2012-13 catalogue):


Wright State University is offering this course in 2012-13:


The University of Massachusetts was offering comparative courses in 2011:



No-one seems to have checked this entry on Academia.edu for a department at Ashford University. Interesting combination though:


Another unusual academic department:

 
It's a research area that turns out to be popular internationally:


Presumably this is the kind of thing you can go for when you've done the preliminary courses:

Tuesday 15 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 20

Warwick University's student newspaper The Boar misplaced its spellchecker some time ago, and it still seems to be missing:

 
The same error features in the printed version, which adds further information about the author.

 The Boar, 35:6 (9 January 2012), p. 7.
 
I'm not sure what a Comment Editor does, but it seems not to involve editing in the sense of checking or proofreading…

Monday 14 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 19

Continuing on from yesterday's new thread, this doesn't sound very appetizing; fortunately it's not a cookbook:


The word is spelt correctly on the cover of the image used by the outlet, and twice in the blurb, so there's no excuse…

Saturday 12 January 2013

You Cannot Be Serious, # 4

It's not the hideous grammatical error that secures this clipping its place in You Cannot Be Serious, but the unfortunate extraneous preposition :

Source: Rugby Observer (print), 10 January 2013, p. 3;  online

Friday 11 January 2013

You Cannot Be Serious, # 3

From the archives, this one goes well beyond the basics of spellchecking and proofreading, and into the land of fantasy newspaper caption creationunless Mr Lang is being cast as a descendant of Sweeney ToddIt's a clipping I've cherished for many years; sadly, I forgot to date it (pre-mainstream internet, though), but I think it was published in the early 1990s:

 Source: Daily Telegraph (date unlogged)

Wednesday 9 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 17

Not least because of the rather strange link titles, I spent some time wondering whether this mangle was deliberate, perhaps an attempt to communicate an ironic or cynical message.

In the end, I decided that I was overthinking it: it's just an unchecked typographical error. (Note that it's also crept into the URL, which tends to offer a bigger challenge in terms of correcting errors subsequently.)


Tuesday 8 January 2013

Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 16

Like eNotes.com (see You Cannot Be Serious, # 2), StudyMode.com (motto: 'Inspiring Better Grades') offers essays to students, although the site explicitly decries plagiarism:
Let’s be clear: submitting another person's work as your own is plagiarism, and we’re against it. While you may legitimately cite these works and use them as reference material and thought-starters to your heart’s content, please do not turn in articles from this website as your own.

It's a bit of a conflict of interest, then, that the site carries sponsored advertising for tailored essays and reports:



StudyMode also has a premium service, with prices ranging from 29.95USD per month to 89.95USD for a six-month subscription,* which allows access to full-length essays.


In case you thought I'd forgotten the mangling, here's a small selection of examples, focussed on, but not confined to, a mangle we've encountered before and will certainly meet again:






* Source: Sarah Glazer, 'Plagiarism and Cheating', CQ Researcher, 23 (4 January, 2013), 1-28. Consulted online, 8 January 2013.

Monday 7 January 2013

Not Washed or Cooked, # 4

This is an example of the kind of typographical error I particularly despise, not simply because it's sloppy and avoidable, but because it turns tragedy into farce:


The word 'shotting' does, in fact, exist: the Oxford English Dictionary defines it as 'The action of weighting with shot; esp. in Angling, the weighting of the line with shot', though it's not in common usage, and the spellcheckers in Word, WordPerfect and Blogger have all highlighted it as unknown. Surely someone at the DT should have spotted it
 

Sunday 6 January 2013

Apostrophe catastrophe, # 2

My cousin had this for Christmas:



Found it yet? Here's the detail enlarged:


They also do this one:

King of the kitchen, but not of the grammar…