![]() |
| Link: West Tennessee Examiner, ‘Provocative and radial stage play […]’ |
Businesses that don't bother checking their websites, journalists who write gibberish and balderdash, professionals who can't take the extra time and effort to spell-check and proofread, newspapers that turn tragedy into farce through solecisms, plus the odd guide to solving common grammatical difficulties… Contributions and suggestions welcome. (… Also corrections if required, obviously!) Send to: manglingenglishATgmxDOTcom, stating your nom de mangle (if desired).
Sunday, 5 April 2015
Spellchecking Is Never Enough, # 173
Easter brings this oddity:
radial for radical
Saturday, 4 April 2015
Double-take, # 145
A nasty case, including singular-as-plural, a syntactical minefield, and some punctuation overkill:
![]() |
| Source: Rugby Observer (20 November, 2014), p. 16, and online |
Friday, 3 April 2015
You Cannot Be Serious, # 42
If you’ve ever wondered how all those inked mangles arise, this is from an advertisement for a new tattoo shop in Rugby:
![]() |
| Source: Rugby Observer (19 March 2015), p. 3, and online |
Thursday, 2 April 2015
The Wrong Word Entirely, # 76
As Des Pond of Slough said, today’s mangle provides ‘Buckets of meaninglessness’:
![]() |
| Link: BBC iWonder, ‘How are serial killers caught?’ (6: ‘Debunking myths’) |
Also notable is the byline, which states that the piece was not written, but ‘Authored by’ one John
Bennett. The BBC’s iWonder (or, according to its logo, iW?nder) project was launched in March 2014 and was heavily trailed on BBC television. On launch day, the BBC’s internet blog explained: ‘BBC
iWonder is a new factual and educational brand from the BBC, and it’s
all about feeding the UK’s curiosity.’
pail into insignificance; authored by
Wednesday, 1 April 2015
Double-take, # 144
Des Pond of Slough spotted this amusing mangle in a BBC News breadcrumb:
$800 fortune
![]() |
| Link: BBC News, ‘Apple boss Tim Cook “to donate millions” to charity’ |
Tuesday, 31 March 2015
Double-take, # 143
John Holloway felt that something in the email from his solicitor was not quite right:
responaw for respondent
Monday, 30 March 2015
Double-take, # 142
This comes via John Holloway, who comments: ‘A submarine blockage or a submarine blockade?’ As often happens, it’s hard to tell whether the mangle is due to a typographical error or a genuine confusion of words:
![]() |
| Link: BBC iPlayer, ‘2–6 March 1915. Home Front — Omnibus’ |
Sunday, 29 March 2015
Apostrophe catastrophe, # 77
Dr Faustus may have been left in the Royal Mail Delivery Office queue for too long:
Gertrudes letter
Gertrudes letter
Saturday, 28 March 2015
The Wrong Word Entirely, # 75
This is the Facebook notification of the results of an internet questionnaire, which may well have more mangles in it and can be found here:
lam of innocence
Friday, 27 March 2015
Singular or Plural? # 15
Following on nicely from Wednesday’s ill-formed and verbose headlines and yesterday’s two-nouns-with-singular-verb comes another grammatically suspect and overlong headline, spotted by Des Pond of Slough:
![]() |
| Link: The Telegraph, ‘Prince Charles letters […] |
Thursday, 26 March 2015
Wednesday, 25 March 2015
You Cannot Be Serious, # 41
A new contributor, with the nom-de-mangle fellow grammar enthusiast & coffee snob, has sent this horrible headline and subhead, which only a small change in word order and/or better punctuation might have improved — and when did headings become so lengthy and detailed?
![]() |
| Link: The Guardian |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











